2026 Directory

35 AWS Consulting Partners

Compare partners for migration, managed operations, cost governance, and platform-specific delivery.

Jump to firms
By Peter Korpak, Founder · Last updated: July 20, 2026 · See our methodology

Use this directory to compare 35 AWS consulting partners by service fit, public credentials, and the evidence needed to qualify a delivery team. Start with your workload, operating model, and risk constraints; a partner tier alone does not establish fit.

How to evaluate AWS consulting partners

The AWS Partner Solutions Finder lets buyers search for partners by business need and shows AWS-verified distinctions such as Competencies and Service Validations. Use it to build a longlist, then move quickly from badge checking to evidence: the individual people, services, and operating responsibilities proposed for your environment.

Match the credential to the workload. A partner may be highly capable in migration, security, data, or managed operations without being equally capable in every AWS service. Ask which publicly listed distinction is relevant to the workload you are buying, which AWS services it covers, and whether the proposed engineers worked on the comparable customer engagements used to support it.

Separate build from run. A migration proposal should identify discovery outputs, workload sequencing, cutover and rollback ownership, and the operational handoff. For managed services, request a responsibility matrix that separates the provider's monitoring, incident response, security, change, and cost-governance duties from the responsibilities retained by your team and AWS.

Make commercial scope testable. Compare what is included rather than relying on a single headline fee: accounts and workloads covered, support channels, severity definitions, reporting, security tooling, change windows, third-party software, and transition assistance. A written exit and documentation plan is as important as the onboarding plan.

Listed alphabetically — we don't rank firms by a hidden score. How we evaluate →

$200K+ typical · 500-1000 employees · AWS Premier Partner
AWSAzureGCP
View →
$250K-$1M+ · 10,000+ cloud specialists globally · Premier Partner
AWSAzureGCP
View →
$200K-$800K · 6,000+ AWS-certified · Premier Partner
AWSAzureGCP
View →
Caylent Featured
$200K+ typical · 200-500 employees · AWS Premier Partner
Project-based; no published rates. Managed services offered in tiered packages (Basic, Advanced, Premier). AWS funding expertise cited as cost offset mechanism. · ~100–175 employees; 100+ AWS-certified technical staff · AWS Premier Partner
$100K-$400K + managed services · 120+ healthcare cloud specialists · Advanced Partner
$50K-$500K (3PAO) · $750K-$2M (full Moderate ATO program) · ~1,000 employees, 100+ frameworks supported · Compliance & FedRAMP Specialist
AWSAzureGCP
View →
$180K-$600K · 5,000+ AWS professionals · Advanced Partner
AWSAzureGCP
View →
$300K-$2M+ · 8,000+ cloud professionals · Premier Partner
AWSAzureGCP
View →
$150K-$600K + managed services · 400+ cloud engineers · Premier Partner
GCPAWS
View →
Enterprise contract pricing only — no published rates. Multi-year managed services contracts typically run $5M–$100M+ annually; project-based transformation engagements are project-quoted. Opaque at the SOW level; expect structured procurement cycles. · ~127,000 employees across 70+ countries (ISG FY24 data) · Global Enterprise IT Services
AWSAzureGCP
View →
Not publicly disclosed; no Clutch/G2 pricing data found. Managed services and project engagements likely in the $150K–$1M+ range based on firm size, MSP designation, and public-sector complexity. · ~200-300 employees (PitchBook: ~202; Crunchbase range: 251-500) · AWS Premier Partner — Public Sector Specialist
Enterprise rates; no published pricing. Typical engagements are project- or program-based; staffing/managed-service models available. Expect premium rates comparable to Accenture or Capgemini technical practices — not Indian SI cost-led pricing. · ~62,850 employees (December 2025); ~56,600 delivery professionals; 15,000+ AWS-experienced engineers; 2,000+ Google Cloud engineers; 5,000+ AWS certifications · Global Engineering & Cloud Transformation Partner
AWSAzureGCP
View →
$80K-$600K (project) · IR retainer hours-based · ~1,000 employees, 60%+ technical practitioners · Pure-Play Security Integrator
AWSAzureGCP
View →
Enterprise SI — contract values not publicly disclosed. Vendr community data suggests median software/services contracts near ~$50K, but cloud transformation programs at HCLTech's scale typically run into the millions. Expect multi-year MSA structures with T&M or outcome-based SLAs. Pricing is opaque; require detailed SOW itemization. · ~227,000 employees globally; 40,000+ certified cloud professionals; 80,000+ trained Microsoft engineers; 30,000+ Microsoft certified professionals; 22,000+ AWS-trained resources · Global SI — Multi-Cloud
AWSAzureGCP
View →
Enterprise/opaque — no published rates. Multi-year transformation programs typically range from $2M to $50M+; managed services engagements are structured as multi-year contracts. IBM can access AWS MAP and Microsoft co-investment funds to offset client costs. · ~160,000 consultants globally (IBM Consulting segment); IBM total headcount ~270,000 (2024 10-K) · Global Systems Integrator — Hybrid Cloud & AI
AWSAzureGCP
View →
Not publicly listed — enterprise contracts, FTE-based pricing model typical of global SIs. Rates negotiated by program scope; annual managed services deals run eight figures for large enterprises. · 320,000+ total employees (FY2025); cloud practice spans thousands of certified practitioners across Infosys Cobalt · AWS Premier Partner · Azure Expert MSP · GCP Premier Partner
AWSAzureGCP
View →
Enterprise managed-services contracts — not publicly disclosed. Multi-year agreements typically range from mid-seven figures to nine figures for large outsourcing deals; Kyndryl Consult advisory engagements are smaller and project-based. No self-serve pricing available; expect RFP or direct negotiation. · ~73,000 employees globally (as of March 31, 2025; down from ~90,000 at spin-off); workforce hubs in India, Poland, Brazil, Japan, Czechia, Hungary · Global Managed Infrastructure & Cloud Services
AWSAzureGCP
View →
$25K-$150K (retainer) · custom for active IR · enterprise-negotiated · ~1,400-2,000 consultants and analysts · Incident Response Leader
AWSAzureGCP
View →
$100K+ typical · 200-500 employees · AWS Premier Partner
$200K-$700K · 4,000+ cloud certified · Advanced Partner
AWSAzureGCP
View →
$150K-$1M+ (project) · $25K-$120K/mo (managed) · ~2,400 employees, 600+ security practitioners · Pure-Play Security Integrator
AWSAzureGCP
View →
$20K–$50K (POC/pilot) · $200K–$1M+ (full platform build or migration) · Elastic Operations retainer pricing varies by scope · ~800–1,000 employees (680 LinkedIn, ~968 Revelio Labs estimate, April 2026); global delivery across US, India, and LATAM · Snowflake Elite & Data Platform Specialist
AWSAzureGCP
View →
$100K-$500K (project) · MDR subscription OPEX · ~3,500-5,000 employees · AWS Premier Partner + MDR
AWSAzureGCP
View →
$150K-$550K · 400+ data specialists · Advanced Partner
GCPAWSAzure
View →
Custom / private offer only — no published rate card. Offshore-heavy delivery model suggests cost advantage vs. pure-onshore peers; engagement size not publicly disclosed. · ~3,100 employees (per LinkedIn data, Q2 2026); 3,500+ cloud-certified professionals (self-reported) · AI/ML Engineering Specialist
GCPAWSAzure
View →
$150K+ typical · 5,000+ employees · AWS Premier Partner
AWSAzureGCP
View →
$200K-$800K · 800+ cloud engineers · Premier Partner
GCPAWS
View →
$15K-$100K (SOC 2 Type I/II) · $50K-$500K+ (FedRAMP 3PAO by impact level) · custom-quoted · ~516 employees (2025) · Independent Security & Privacy Compliance Assessor
AWSAzureGCP
View →
Slalom Featured
$250K+ typical · 10,000+ employees · AWS Premier Partner
AWSAzureGCP
View →
$180K-$650K · 3,000+ Azure specialists · Premier Partner
AzureAWS
View →
$120K-$400K · 500+ cloud engineers · Select Partner
AWSAzureGCP
View →
$150K-$500K · 12,000+ cloud specialists · Advanced Partner
AWSAzureGCP
View →
Premium — engagement costs not publicly disclosed; senior engineer billing rates reported in the $150–$250+/hr range; multi-month modernization programs typically run $500K–$5M+. · ~10,000 Thoughtworkers across 47 offices in 18 countries (post-take-private headcount, per 2025 press releases) · Engineering-Led Modernization Consultancy
AWSAzureGCP
View →
$160K-$550K · 8,000+ AWS certified · Advanced Partner
AWSAzureGCP
View →

Scope an AWS engagement before comparing proposals

Price is only comparable after each firm is quoting the same operating boundary. Give every finalist the same inventory, service objectives, compliance constraints, and desired decision date. Ask for assumptions and exclusions in plain language.

  • Discovery: inventory sources, application owners, dependency mapping, and the decision artefacts you will receive.
  • Delivery: migration pattern by workload, testing and acceptance criteria, cutover ownership, rollback conditions, and documentation.
  • Operations: named services and accounts, alert handling, incident communications, patching and change management, and cost-review cadence.
  • Governance: security boundaries, access model, reporting, subcontractors, and how the relationship ends or transitions.

Match AWS partner evidence to the workstream

An AWS partner relationship can cover a short assessment, a migration program, an application modernization, or years of managed operations. Those jobs require different evidence. Build one evaluation lane for each workstream instead of treating a broad AWS practice as proof of every capability.

Migration and modernization

Ask for the inventory source, dependency-mapping method, workload disposition, migration-wave logic, and the artefacts delivered at the end of discovery. For modernization, require an explicit boundary between platform changes and application-code changes. Confirm who owns testing, cutover, rollback, data validation, and post-migration stabilization. A case study is most useful when the source environment, workload pattern, constraints, and outcome resemble your own.

Landing zone, security, and governance

Establish who designs and operates AWS Organizations, accounts, identity, network boundaries, logging, policy controls, and security findings. The partner should explain which controls are preventative, which are detective, how exceptions are approved, and how changes move through code review. Ask to see a sanitized responsibility matrix and a sample architecture decision record; both reveal more than a generic security capability slide.

Managed operations and reliability

Separate AWS product availability from the provider's operational commitments. Define alert ownership, acknowledgement, escalation, service restoration, communications, maintenance, backup checks, restore tests, and corrective actions. Meet the people on the escalation path and confirm how application owners participate when infrastructure is healthy but the business service is degraded.

FinOps and cost governance

Require a baseline, a change-approval process, and a way to distinguish realized savings from recommendations that were never implemented. The proposal should say who reviews commitments, rightsizing, storage lifecycle, idle resources, data-transfer patterns, and cost allocation. Test whether the commercial model creates incentives that conflict with reducing spend, and require the provider to report actions, owners, and measured results.

For a final shortlist, compare the named delivery team, not only the firm record. Record each person's role, location, availability, relevant AWS experience, and replacement terms. Then validate references against the same workstream and operating model you plan to buy.

Frequently Asked Questions

How should I compare AWS consulting partners?

Start with the workload and operating model, then verify that the delivery team—not merely the firm—has experience with the AWS services, compliance obligations, and migration pattern in scope. Ask each finalist for a comparable reference and a written responsibility matrix.

What AWS credentials are useful screening signals?

Use the AWS Partner Solutions Finder to check a partner's public program distinctions and solution focus. Then ask which credential applies to your use case and how the proposed team has used it on similar workloads.

What should an AWS migration proposal include?

Require a workload-by-workload assessment, assumptions and exclusions, a dependency and cutover plan, security ownership, rollback criteria, and the named people responsible for delivery. A proposal should distinguish discovery from implementation and operations.

How should managed AWS services be scoped?

Define the services and accounts covered, monitoring and incident ownership, change windows, security responsibilities, reporting cadence, and exit documentation. AWS service availability commitments and a provider's operational service levels are separate commitments.

How can I avoid a partner-directory-only shortlist?

Treat a directory listing as a discovery starting point. Compare directly relevant case studies, meet the engineers who will operate or build the environment, and check references on the specific service scope you are buying.